'Criminal Theory Essay\r'

'People with anti- societal behaviors are be by â€Å"A persuasive pattern of inattention for, and violation, of the rights of differents that begins in advance(prenominal)(a) childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood. ” (Walsh and Hemmens page 238) People with this disorder are up for greater health risks, for the disorder makes a soulfulness be a risk taker, usually engage in smoking, alcohol, risky sexual behavior’s and drugs. Their also at risk for they are given to depression, inflicting self-wounds and violent carrys towards others. In this state of mind lot are emotional, non-cognitive, and have low self-esteem.\r\nMaking them act come in(p) in violent manners. This behavior is link to childhood. As a child if something wasn’t right, they were shy or forgotten they probably jell on a mask and faked being what society surveys as universal. They are non connected with society. And they do not earn well-disposed norms. Th ey have become experts on faking findings, and they do not receipt emotion or empathy. These peck are deceitful, manipulative, egocentric, selfish and lacking wrong-doing. transaction with regards of disgust and Anti-social disorder, the criminals often view that their dupes were not â€Å" molest”.\r\nDrug users viewing their addiction to a social norm that isn’t on that layover. They do not chthonianstand what they are doing is wrong and have no downstairsstanding of guilt or cognitive thinking process. They do not feel any kind of regret for the things of which they have d ane simply because they cannot empathize with the population or actions against which they are offending. Neutralization system was created by Skyes and Matza. This theory explains that the offender has a positive view on the crime he or she has committed. too similar to Anti-Social individuals these criminals view that they have tangle withe postcode wrong.\r\nUnlike Anti-Social disorder, Neutralization theory states that the offender puts the excuses in their own head, not merely at a lower placestanding the social norms. There are five techniques that Neutralization theory uses in in force(p)ifying their crimes. The first way people sabotage their crimes and actions they have done is called â€Å" self-renunciation of Responsibility” which is slip the blame from the offender to the victim. An example is when a raper says in court â€Å"she was asking for it the way she was togged up and or acting. ” They feel absolutely no guilt for the crimes that they have committed.\r\nThey feel no responsibility at all for the victim and their injuries. The second technique is called â€Å" defending team of Injury”. This is where the offender has no attachment to the crime and has not caused any real injury or offenses. An example of this would be a someone breaking a entering and smashing a window in and claiming â€Å"the insurance wi ll cover it. ” â€Å"Denial of Victim” is the third technique. This is where the offender says the victim accredited what they deserved, almost viewed as karma. Most domestic cases limn this, saying significant other or victim got what they deserved from these actions.\r\nThe fourth technique is â€Å"Condemnation of the Condemners” where the offender states part of the blame on the condemners. These condemners are patrol, parents, probation officers, and so on An example of this would be the criminal blaming the officer for lay evidence on them or the crime jibe and not taking any of the responsibility that it was there’s. Number five is â€Å"Appeal to a high Loyalty”. This is where the offender in committed and or loyal to something or someone in their life history for the greater good according to their beliefs. Things that would fall under this category re murder or assault. A good example of this would be a person under mafia rule murd ering someone for the attraction or the greater good of that mafia. Ted Bundy was do storied for his criminal actions. His five-state murder spree was not mildly forgotten. Bundy killed over 100 women and single gave information astir(predicate) where the bo mutters were of fifty of the acclaimed victims. Comparing his life, actions, and behavior point to Anti-Social behavioural theory and Neutralization theory the most. Putting these theories to the quiz trying to profile a serial killer.\r\nTheodore Robert Cowell was born(p) in 1946 to an single mother that moved in with her parents. He grew up thinking his grandparents were is parents and his mother was his sister. ulterior in life his mother married and he became Ted Bundy. Growing up he was a â€Å"normal” child, he was an irresistible teen that was well care in school. He did relatively well in his academics. He was cognise for being shy; people profiled him to be socially awkward. He never did buzz off out of this stage and the profile followed him to college. Bundy went first to the University of Puget Sound. It was a highly regarded school and many of its students were wealthy.\r\nThis made ted feel inadequate and inferior callable to financial aspects. He left and went to University of Washington. His shyness held him back with social activities and dating, but Bundy did find someone that he fell for. They had the same(p) skiing passion, spending most of days on the slopes. And he currently fell in distinguish and became obsessive. He tried impressing her with receiving scholarships and accomplishments but they fell flat. She s snarf the relationship saying he wasn’t divergence anywhere in life and wasn’t maintain material. This haunted him for the rest of his life and fell into an total depression.\r\nWhile in this depression he had dropped out of school. His anti-social behavior got worse. Also during this clipping he institute out who his mother actually was. Bundy was a on a slippery slope smoothhill, he was label as a petty thief. He soon came out of his depression had false bravo, went back to college and got a bachelor’s degree in psychology. With his natural-fashioned found self he was on top of the world. He was with a new woman that adored him and his first love wanted him back. He had one foot in the political arena. During his time at college women had gone missing from campus.\r\nThey narrowed the quest down to a man asking for help past snap the women. Bundy being smart realized it was only just a matter of time gutter local officials connected the dots. So Bundy moved to universal time and enrolled in the University of doh. He didn’t stop his attacks just because he had moved. Women were being abducted and reported missing at the campus and malls around the city. While in Utah police had discovered a graveyard of bones. They eventually put the dots together and figured out it was Ted. They now kne w that he was dealing with a criminal that could go crosswise state lines.\r\nBundy didn’t stop at Utah he also went to Colorado during ski while and killed women there before he was finally caught due to a car suspicion. He was charged with kidnapping charges. During his trial he was charged with murder of one known victim. But he escaped out the library widow being his own attorney. He made his way down to Florida where he rented a house at Florida State University. He was known for his sorority house killings. Ted Bundy was arrested again due to evidence of teeth impressions on a victim’s chest. He was charged with murder and recieved a plea obligation of three twenty five year sentences.\r\nHe refused the plea and wanted another trail during this time new evidence came forward and at the new trail he was sentenced to death by agent of the electric chair. Prior to his death he move over 100 murders, keeping some heads of his victims and necrophilia. When asked w hy he did everything he blamed it on his early exposures to pornography as his stimulants to his obsession with murder. Ted Bundy falls under a lot of different theories but Anti-Social behavioural theory is most demanding. He was awkward in his youth, not in a strong permanent family life, had difficulty dating and participating in other social events.\r\nHe wore a mask covering himself from the world. He knew he was different and had to change or it would be noticed, so he became a well-known(a) member of society and was respected. He felt no remorse for things that he had done. This action falls under Psychopathy, he found pleasure in re-living kills. sacking towards Neutralization theory he blamed the women for the things that he had done. He connected them to his college girlfriend that had dumped him. That they needed to die because of what she did to him. That neutralized any feeling he had towards make these killings.\r\nHe strongly viewed he was not at fault, and he pl ead not guilty until he was on the electric chair. In an interview he states â€Å"I don’t know what made people want to be friends. I don’t know what made people attractive to one another. I don’t know what underlays in these social interactions. ” The above statement proves my point of the Anti-Social Behavior. He was lacking things that we as â€Å"normal” mankind beings understand. He goes on to answer the question â€Å" be murders born or made? Nature vs. set up? ” it’s still an ongoing debate to this day. In my opinion and conclusion Ted Bundy was nurtured.\r\n'