Augustuss reforms sought to re- afford roman letters governing physical structure as a monarchy in all but name. How productive were his reforms in modify Roman governance? Was Augustus an ideal governmental leader or a tyrant? After defeating sea gull Anthony and Cleopatra in 31 B.C., Octavian was the solely individual capable of stabilizing the Roman Re earth covering fire to how it had been prior to Caesars death. Although to the public it appeared that he had given back great power to the senators, he was still in control how the Republic operated. This was referable to the incident that the senate granted him special civil and military powers. by means of this he was able to stay in power and discussion the Senate to continue with its traditions. He furthered this by looking and playperforming as if he was just another public servant, never acting as if he was in charge. He furthered his plaza by creating Praetorian Guard, which was meant to pro vide security and prevent rebellion in Rome, and made improvements to their standard of living that ensured loyalty to him. He win popularity with the poor citizens by using his own money to crap ones palms food for them.
I believe that Augustus was a perfect political leader for that time. He able to stabilize a government that was shattered by civil war and founder himself as ruler by malikeg it appear that the people foxy it that way. He didnt try to take over and establish his own form of rule, even though he had the means to do so. He placed him in a mail to be loved by but at the akin time he impleme nted policies that helped the people. ! Lynn Hunt et al., The Making of the western: Peoples and Cultures, 3rd ed. (Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2009), (Pg. 165 167)If you want to get a full(a) essay, sanctify it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment