There argon many cases in which the ethics that an head has argon put on the line. In some cases, disasters whitethorn go on because of something that is known by the engineer, but is never pointed out by the engineer. This is the case in the safety devicety of hoses construct by the XYZ hose Company. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â It is stock practice among farmers to use the chemic anhydrous ammonium hydroxide to fertilize their fields. This is a chemic substance that reacts violently with water, and therefore moldiness be handled very carefully. This chemical is stored in mobile pressurized tanks that are pulled by tractors. The ammonia is transported from the tanks by the industry wide standard hose that is constructed of steel busy reinforced rubber. These hoses connect the tanks to pierced hollow blades that then injure through the soil, and distribute the chemical into the soil. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The XYZ Hose Company, which produces hoses, started to market a u ntested type of hose, a new heavy-duty moldable reinforced hose. These hoses were less expensive, lighter, and easier to the operate than the steel reinforced hoses. These new hoses also met the industry standards. Tests plump by a consultant told XYZ that the ammonia would non at once react with the moldable, but that the plastic would degrade over time, and set down some of its mechanised properties.
After several years, some incidents had occurred where farmers were injure and/or blind due to ruptured hoses. The only warning tail on the hoses verbalise that they should be re pose every few years. XYZ no long er produces these hoses, and the ads that we! re placed stated that refunds would be given and that the hoses were barely obsolete.         This cases raises many estimable issues. Should a product that may not be safe for use be allowed to be change? Why... If you want to see a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment